ATI Radeon 9200 PRO vs RX 480

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3041594
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.66no data
Power efficiency10.46no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameEllesmereRV280
GCN generation4th Genno data
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date29 June 2016 (9 years ago)1 May 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304no data
Compute units36no data
Core clock speed1120 MHz239 MHz
Boost clock speed1266 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate182.30.96
Floating-point processing power5.834 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs1444
L1 Cache576 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length240 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz164 MHz
Memory bandwidth224 GB/s5.248 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
HDMI2.0-
DisplayPort support1.4HDR-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAccelerationn/a-
CrossFire+-
Enduron/a-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3Dn/a-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudion/a-
ZeroCore+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 128.1
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.51.4
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A
Mantlen/a-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 480 8550
+427400%
Samples: 12252
ATI 9200 PRO 2
Samples: 41

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD77no data
1440p51no data
4K36no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.97no data
1440p4.49no data
4K6.36no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 110−120 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 85−90 no data
Counter-Strike 2 110−120 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 no data
Escape from Tarkov 80−85 no data
Far Cry 5 65−70 no data
Fortnite 207 no data
Forza Horizon 4 100 no data
Forza Horizon 5 65−70 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85 no data
Valorant 150−160 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 85−90 no data
Counter-Strike 2 110−120 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 285 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 no data
Dota 2 110−120 no data
Escape from Tarkov 80−85 no data
Far Cry 5 65−70 no data
Fortnite 79 no data
Forza Horizon 4 93 no data
Forza Horizon 5 65−70 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 78 no data
Metro Exodus 41 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 78 no data
Valorant 150−160 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 no data
Dota 2 110−120 no data
Escape from Tarkov 80−85 no data
Far Cry 5 65−70 no data
Forza Horizon 4 77 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44 no data
Valorant 150−160 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 65 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 37 no data
Metro Exodus 27−30 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 241 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 no data
Escape from Tarkov 45−50 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 39 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 36 no data
Metro Exodus 15 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27 no data
Valorant 120 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Counter-Strike 2 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 no data
Dota 2 88 no data
Escape from Tarkov 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 18 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 June 2016 1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 28 Watt

RX 480 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 PRO, on the other hand, has 435.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 480 and Radeon 9200 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 480
Radeon RX 480
ATI Radeon 9200 PRO
Radeon 9200 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2183 votes

Rate Radeon RX 480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 8 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 480 or Radeon 9200 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.