GeForce 8400M G vs Radeon RX 480 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1417
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.94
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameEllesmereG86
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 August 2016 (9 years ago)9 May 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$450 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23048
Core clock speed1000 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1077 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate155.13.200
Floating-point processing power4.963 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs1448
L1 Cache576 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2016 9 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 10 Watt

RX 480 Mobile has an age advantage of 9 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

8400M G, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 480 Mobile and GeForce 8400M G. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 480 Mobile
Radeon RX 480 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G
GeForce 8400M G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 40 votes

Rate Radeon RX 480 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 480 Mobile or GeForce 8400M G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.