Tesla P40 vs Radeon RX 470D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated227
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.05
Power efficiencyno data8.68
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameEllesmereGP102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date21 October 2016 (9 years ago)13 September 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17923840
Core clock speed926 MHz1303 MHz
Boost clock speed1206 MHz1531 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate135.1367.4
Floating-point processing power4.322 TFLOPS11.76 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs112240
L1 Cache448 KB1.4 MB
L2 Cache2 MB3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1650 MHz1808 MHz
Memory bandwidth211.2 GB/s347.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 October 2016 13 September 2016
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 250 Watt

RX 470D has an age advantage of 1 month, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 108.3% lower power consumption.

Tesla P40, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 470D and Tesla P40. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 470D is a desktop graphics card while Tesla P40 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 470D
Radeon RX 470D
NVIDIA Tesla P40
Tesla P40

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 148 votes

Rate Radeon RX 470D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 204 votes

Rate Tesla P40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 470D or Tesla P40, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.