Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano vs RX 470D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameEllesmereVega 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 October 2016 (9 years ago)1 October 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17924096
Core clock speed926 MHz1156 MHz
Boost clock speed1206 MHz1247 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate135.1319.2
Floating-point processing power4.322 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3264
TMUs112256
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm152 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1650 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth211.2 GB/s409.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12.0
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 October 2016 1 October 2017
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 250 Watt

RX 470D has 108% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 64 Nano, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 470D and Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 155 votes

Rate Radeon RX 470D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 470D or Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.