Arc A380 vs Radeon RX 470 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 470 Mobile with Arc A380, including specs and performance data.
RX 470 Mobile outperforms Arc A380 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 320 | 348 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 9.86 | 42.76 |
| Power efficiency | 14.59 | 14.73 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) |
| GPU code name | Ellesmere | DG2-128 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 4 August 2016 (8 years ago) | 14 June 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549.99 | $149 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Arc A380 has 334% better value for money than RX 470 Mobile.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 926 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1074 MHz | 2050 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,700 million | 7,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 137.5 | 131.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.399 TFLOPS | 4.198 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 128 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | no data | 222 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 96 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1937 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 186.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
| HDMI | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 50−55
+6.4%
| 47
−6.4%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 11.00
−247%
| 3.17
+247%
|
- Arc A380 has 247% lower cost per frame in 1080p
FPS performance in popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - Full HD
Epic Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Epic Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset - 4K
Epic Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 95−100
−88.7%
|
183
+88.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
−13.9%
|
41
+13.9%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 30−35
+43.5%
|
23
−43.5%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+10.8%
|
65−70
−10.8%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 95−100
−25.8%
|
122
+25.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+9.1%
|
33
−9.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
−8.8%
|
62
+8.8%
|
| Fortnite | 90−95
+9.4%
|
85−90
−9.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
−8.6%
|
76
+8.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 50−55
−33.3%
|
72
+33.3%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 30−35
+83.3%
|
18
−83.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 60−65
+14.3%
|
55−60
−14.3%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+8.1%
|
120−130
−8.1%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+10.8%
|
65−70
−10.8%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 95−100
+70.2%
|
57
−70.2%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 210−220
+7.5%
|
200−210
−7.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+24.1%
|
29
−24.1%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110
+18.8%
|
85−90
−18.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
57
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 90−95
+9.4%
|
85−90
−9.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
−2.9%
|
72
+2.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 50−55
−18.5%
|
64
+18.5%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 60−65
+93.9%
|
33
−93.9%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 30−35
+154%
|
13
−154%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
−11.1%
|
40
+11.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 60−65
+14.3%
|
55−60
−14.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 45−50
−40.4%
|
66
+40.4%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+8.1%
|
120−130
−8.1%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+10.8%
|
65−70
−10.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+38.5%
|
26
−38.5%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110
+18.8%
|
85−90
−18.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+9.6%
|
52
−9.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+22.8%
|
57
−22.8%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 30−35
+371%
|
7
−371%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 60−65
+14.3%
|
55−60
−14.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 45−50
+38.2%
|
34
−38.2%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+8.1%
|
120−130
−8.1%
|
| Fortnite | 90−95
+9.4%
|
85−90
−9.4%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
+16.7%
|
30−33
−16.7%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 120−130
+11.6%
|
110−120
−11.6%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 27−30
+16%
|
24−27
−16%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
+15.8%
|
18−20
−15.8%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+10.2%
|
140−150
−10.2%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+8.4%
|
150−160
−8.4%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+11.6%
|
40−45
−11.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+14.3%
|
14−16
−14.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+12.1%
|
30−35
−12.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+13.2%
|
35−40
−13.2%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 18−20
+18.8%
|
16−18
−18.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+13%
|
21−24
−13%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
+14.7%
|
30−35
−14.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+27.3%
|
10−12
−27.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
+10.7%
|
27−30
−10.7%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−12
+22.2%
|
9−10
−22.2%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
+18.2%
|
10−12
−18.2%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+14.3%
|
21−24
−14.3%
|
| Valorant | 95−100
+13.1%
|
80−85
−13.1%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+13.6%
|
21−24
−13.6%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+27.3%
|
10−12
−27.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
| Dota 2 | 60−65
+20%
|
50−55
−20%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+12.5%
|
16−18
−12.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33
+11.1%
|
27−30
−11.1%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−12
+22.2%
|
9−10
−22.2%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+13.3%
|
14−16
−13.3%
|
| Fortnite | 16−18
+13.3%
|
14−16
−13.3%
|
This is how RX 470 Mobile and Arc A380 compete in popular games:
- RX 470 Mobile is 6% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Hogwarts Legacy, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 470 Mobile is 371% faster.
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Arc A380 is 89% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 470 Mobile is ahead in 52 tests (83%)
- Arc A380 is ahead in 10 tests (16%)
- there's a draw in 1 test (2%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 15.68 | 13.96 |
| Recency | 4 August 2016 | 14 June 2022 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 75 Watt |
RX 470 Mobile has a 12.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.
Arc A380, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 13.3% lower power consumption.
The Radeon RX 470 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A380 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon RX 470 Mobile is a notebook card while Arc A380 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
