Arc A380 vs Radeon RX 470 Mobile

Place in the ranking	305	333
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.14	44.33
Power efficiency	14.80	14.90
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	Ellesmere	DG2-128
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	4 August 2016 (8 years ago)	14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$549.99	$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A380 has 337% better value for money than RX 470 Mobile.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	1024
Core clock speed	926 MHz	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1074 MHz	2050 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	137.5	131.2
Floating-point processing power	4.399 TFLOPS	4.198 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128	64
Tensor Cores	no data	128
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	222 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	186.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 470 Mobile 18.23
+12.5%

Arc A380 16.20

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 470 Mobile 10715
+5.3%

Arc A380 10174

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

50−55
+6.4%

−6.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

11.00
−247%

3.17

+247%

Arc A380 has 247% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −46.9%	47 +46.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +20%	30−33 −20%
Elden Ring	55−60 +26.7%	45 −26.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +11.5%	50−55 −11.5%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −15.6%	37 +15.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +20%	30−33 −20%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −23.7%	94 +23.7%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −28.6%	63 +28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +10.3%	35−40 −10.3%
Valorant	70−75 +12.3%	65−70 −12.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +11.5%	50−55 −11.5%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +3.2%	31 −3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +20%	30−33 −20%
Dota 2	65−70 +97%	33 −97%
Elden Ring	55−60 +14%	50−55 −14%
Far Cry 5	60−65 −1.6%	64 +1.6%
Fortnite	95−100 +10.1%	85−90 −10.1%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −5.3%	80 +5.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	60−65 +93.9%	33 −93.9%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +11.4%	44 −11.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 +8.7%	110−120 −8.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +10.3%	35−40 −10.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +14%	50−55 −14%
Valorant	70−75 +12.3%	65−70 −12.3%
World of Tanks	220−230 +7.8%	200−210 −7.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +11.5%	50−55 −11.5%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +18.5%	27 −18.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +20%	30−33 −20%
Dota 2	65−70 +18.2%	55−60 −18.2%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +8.6%	55−60 −8.6%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +24.6%	61 −24.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 +8.7%	110−120 −8.7%
Valorant	70−75 +12.3%	65−70 −12.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	27−30 +16.7%	24−27 −16.7%
Elden Ring	30−33 +20%	24−27 −20%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 +16.7%	24−27 −16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 +10%	150−160 −10%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
World of Tanks	120−130 +11.6%	110−120 −11.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +12.1%	30−35 −12.1%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +17.5%	40−45 −17.5%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +15%	40−45 −15%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +13.9%	35−40 −13.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +14.3%	21−24 −14.3%
Valorant	45−50 +12.2%	40−45 −12.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Dota 2	30−35 +10.7%	27−30 −10.7%
Elden Ring	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +10.7%	27−30 −10.7%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 +12.5%	45−50 −12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +10.7%	27−30 −10.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +20%	14−16 −20%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Dota 2	30−35 +14.8%	27−30 −14.8%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +15%	20−22 −15%
Fortnite	21−24 +10.5%	18−20 −10.5%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +17.4%	21−24 −17.4%
Valorant	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%

This is how RX 470 Mobile and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

RX 470 Mobile is 6% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 470 Mobile is 97% faster.
in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Arc A380 is 47% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 470 Mobile is ahead in 49 tests (89%)
Arc A380 is ahead in 6 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	18.23	16.20
Recency	4 August 2016	14 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	75 Watt