ATI Radeon 7200 vs RX 460

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4891602
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.12no data
Power efficiency10.05no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameBaffinR100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 August 2016 (9 years ago)1 April 2000 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896no data
Core clock speed1090 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate67.201
Floating-point processing power2.15 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs566
L1 Cache224 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 4x
Length170 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s5.312 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x VGA
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)7.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 460 4100
+204900%
Samples: 3882
ATI 7200 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD41no data
1440p50no data
4K20no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.10no data
1440p1.72no data
4K4.30no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike 2 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 no data
Far Cry 5 40 no data
Fortnite 116 no data
Forza Horizon 4 57 no data
Forza Horizon 5 30−33 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 36 no data
Valorant 90−95 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike 2 50−55 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 no data
Dota 2 70−75 no data
Far Cry 5 37 no data
Fortnite 39 no data
Forza Horizon 4 54 no data
Forza Horizon 5 30−33 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 35 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20 no data
Metro Exodus 21 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 28 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37 no data
Valorant 90−95 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 no data
Dota 2 70−75 no data
Far Cry 5 34 no data
Forza Horizon 4 41 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23 no data
Valorant 90−95 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 31 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Metro Exodus 10−12 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55 no data
Valorant 100−110 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 21−24 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data
Metro Exodus 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12 no data
Valorant 50−55 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14 no data
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 11 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2016 1 April 2000
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 23 Watt

RX 460 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7200, on the other hand, has 226.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 460 and Radeon 7200. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 460
Radeon RX 460
ATI Radeon 7200
Radeon 7200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1143 votes

Rate Radeon RX 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 24 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 460 or Radeon 7200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.