GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon RX 460 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 460 Mobile with GeForce GTX 550 Ti, including specs and performance data.
460 Mobile outperforms 550 Ti by a whopping 151% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 511 | 769 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 78 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.71 |
| Power efficiency | 13.12 | 2.47 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | Baffin | GF116 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 8 August 2016 (9 years ago) | 15 March 2011 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | $149 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 896 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 116 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Texture fill rate | 66.08 | 28.80 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.115 TFLOPS | 0.6912 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 24 |
| TMUs | 56 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | 384 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Bus support | no data | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 210 mm |
| Height | no data | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin |
| SLI options | - | + |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 4.1 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 98.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI |
| Multi monitor support | no data | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
| Audio input for HDMI | no data | Internal |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | - | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 95−100
+150%
| 38
−150%
|
| Full HD | 35
−5.7%
| 37
+5.7%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 2.46
+63.9%
| 4.03
−63.9%
|
- RX 460 Mobile has 64% lower cost per frame in 1080p
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+264%
|
14−16
−264%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+138%
|
8−9
−138%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 18−20
+260%
|
5−6
−260%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+200%
|
14−16
−200%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+264%
|
14−16
−264%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+138%
|
8−9
−138%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+182%
|
10−12
−182%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+171%
|
21−24
−171%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+128%
|
18−20
−128%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+190%
|
10−11
−190%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+113%
|
16−18
−113%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+76.9%
|
50−55
−76.9%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+200%
|
14−16
−200%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+264%
|
14−16
−264%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 140−150
+112%
|
65−70
−112%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+138%
|
8−9
−138%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+103%
|
30−35
−103%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+182%
|
10−12
−182%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+171%
|
21−24
−171%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+128%
|
18−20
−128%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+190%
|
10−11
−190%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 35−40
+218%
|
10−12
−218%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+171%
|
7−8
−171%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+113%
|
16−18
−113%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30
+173%
|
10−12
−173%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+76.9%
|
50−55
−76.9%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+200%
|
14−16
−200%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+138%
|
8−9
−138%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+103%
|
30−35
−103%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+182%
|
10−12
−182%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+128%
|
18−20
−128%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+113%
|
16−18
−113%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 17
+54.5%
|
10−12
−54.5%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+76.9%
|
50−55
−76.9%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 55−60
+171%
|
21−24
−171%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+125%
|
8−9
−125%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
+157%
|
27−30
−157%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
+1200%
|
1−2
−1200%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+58.1%
|
30−35
−58.1%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
+176%
|
35−40
−176%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+156%
|
9−10
−156%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+186%
|
7−8
−186%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+156%
|
9−10
−156%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+160%
|
5−6
−160%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 20−22
+186%
|
7−8
−186%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+33.3%
|
14−16
−33.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
+175%
|
4−5
−175%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
+178%
|
18−20
−178%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12
+175%
|
4−5
−175%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
| Dota 2 | 35−40
+192%
|
12−14
−192%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+300%
|
4−5
−300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+125%
|
4−5
−125%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 9−10
+125%
|
4−5
−125%
|
This is how RX 460 Mobile and GTX 550 Ti compete in popular games:
- RX 460 Mobile is 150% faster in 900p
- GTX 550 Ti is 6% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 460 Mobile is 1200% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RX 460 Mobile surpassed GTX 550 Ti in all 54 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.47 | 3.77 |
| Recency | 8 August 2016 | 15 March 2011 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 116 Watt |
RX 460 Mobile has a 151% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 186% more advanced lithography process, and 111% lower power consumption.
The Radeon RX 460 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 550 Ti in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon RX 460 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 550 Ti is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
