RX 460 1024SP vs Graphics 320SP

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
not rated
not rated
GCN 4.0
GCN 5.1
GPU code name
Market segment
Launch date
17 January 2017 (4 years ago)
6 January 2020 (1 year ago)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
Core clock speed
1090 MHz
no data
Boost clock speed
1200 MHz
1400 MHz
Number of transistors
3,000 million
9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
7 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
75 Watt
15 Watt
Texture fill rate
Floating-point performance
2,458 gflops
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

PCIe 3.0 x8
170 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
no data


Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
no data
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
7000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
112.0 GB/s
no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

12 (12_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model

Competitors of Radeon RX 460 1024SP from NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon RX 460 1024SP from NVIDIA is GeForce GTX 960.

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX 460 1024SP:

Competitors of Radeon Graphics 320SP from NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon Graphics 320SP from NVIDIA is GeForce GTX 460.

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon Graphics 320SP:

Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP

More pipelines (1024 vs 320)

Advantages of AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP

Much newer (6 January 2020 vs 17 January 2017)

Finer manufacturing process technology (7 vs 14 nm)

Lower power consumption (15W vs 75W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.

So, which one is the better GPU?

Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP and AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP
AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.