Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs Radeon RX 455 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated915
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.35
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)no data
GPU code nameTobagono data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 June 2016 (9 years ago)6 December 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,080 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate50.40no data
Floating-point processing power1.613 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs48no data
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length165 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1625 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth104.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 June 2016 6 December 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 7 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 680 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 1328.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 455 OEM and Qualcomm Adreno 680. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 455 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Qualcomm Adreno 680 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 455 OEM
Radeon RX 455 OEM
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Adreno 680

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 6 votes

Rate Radeon RX 455 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 43 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 455 OEM or Qualcomm Adreno 680, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.