GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Radeon R9 M470X

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M470X with GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost, including specs and performance data.

R9 M470X
2016
4 GB GDDR5
7.64
GTX 650 Ti Boost
2013, $169
2 GB GDDR5, 134 Watt
8.22
+7.6%

650 Ti Boost outperforms R9 M470X by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking581566
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.00
Power efficiencyno data4.74
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameEmeraldGK106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2016 (10 years ago)26 March 2013 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$169

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896768
Core clock speed1000 MHz980 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1033 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data134 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rate61.6066.05
Floating-point processing power1.971 TFLOPS1.585 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs5664
L1 Cache224 KB64 KB
L2 Cache256 KB384 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz6.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s144.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data4 Displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
3D Gaming-+
3D Vision-+
3D Vision Live-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 M470X 7.64
GTX 650 Ti Boost 8.22
+7.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M470X 3175
Samples: 12
GTX 650 Ti Boost 3416
+7.6%
Samples: 2561

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 45−50
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Valorant 75−80
−1.3%
80−85
+1.3%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−6.6%
130−140
+6.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 55−60
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 45−50
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Valorant 75−80
−1.3%
80−85
+1.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 55−60
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Valorant 75−80
−1.3%
80−85
+1.3%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−7.1%
45−50
+7.1%
Valorant 75−80
−1.3%
80−85
+1.3%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.64 8.22
Recency 15 May 2016 26 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB

R9 M470X has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 650 Ti Boost, on the other hand, has a 8% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R9 M470X and GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M470X is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M470X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 463 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M470X or GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.