ATI All-In-Wonder X800 SE vs Radeon R9 M470X

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking570not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameEmeraldR420
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2016 (9 years ago)27 April 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz425 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,080 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Texture fill rate61.603.400
Floating-point processing power1.971 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs568
L1 Cache224 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2016 27 April 2005
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm

R9 M470X has an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M470X and All-In-Wonder X800 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M470X is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder X800 SE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M470X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate All-In-Wonder X800 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M470X or All-In-Wonder X800 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.