GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs Radeon R9 M470

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M470 and GeForce GTX 460M SLI, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M470
2016
4 GB GDDR5
5.83
+21.5%

R9 M470 outperforms GTX 460M SLI by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking605652
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameEmeraldN11E-GS
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 May 2016 (8 years ago)3 September 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768384
Core clock speed900 MHz675 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,080 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Texture fill rate48.00no data
Floating-point processing power1.536 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2x1536 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p60−65
+15.4%
52
−15.4%
Full HD80−85
+19.4%
67
−19.4%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+36.8%
18−20
−36.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+26.3%
18−20
−26.3%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+36.8%
18−20
−36.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Fortnite 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+18.2%
21−24
−18.2%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Valorant 65−70
+11.9%
55−60
−11.9%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+26.3%
18−20
−26.3%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+36.8%
18−20
−36.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+17.3%
80−85
−17.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Dota 2 45−50
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Fortnite 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+18.2%
21−24
−18.2%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Valorant 65−70
+11.9%
55−60
−11.9%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+26.3%
18−20
−26.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Dota 2 45−50
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+18.2%
21−24
−18.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Valorant 65−70
+11.9%
55−60
−11.9%
Fortnite 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+19.4%
35−40
−19.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+12.5%
30−35
−12.5%
Valorant 60−65
+25.5%
50−55
−25.5%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Fortnite 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Valorant 27−30
+21.7%
21−24
−21.7%
Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Fortnite 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

This is how R9 M470 and GTX 460M SLI compete in popular games:

  • R9 M470 is 15% faster in 900p
  • R9 M470 is 19% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R9 M470 is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R9 M470 is ahead in 60 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.83 4.80
Recency 15 May 2016 3 September 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

R9 M470 has a 21.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R9 M470 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460M SLI in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M470
Radeon R9 M470
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M SLI
GeForce GTX 460M SLI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2
5 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce GTX 460M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M470 or GeForce GTX 460M SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.