FirePro M8900 vs Radeon R9 M395X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking446not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.55no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameAmethystBlackcomb
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 May 2015 (11 years ago)12 April 2011 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048960
Core clock speed723 MHz680 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million1,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate92.5432.64
Floating-point processing power2.961 TFLOPS1.306 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs12848
L1 Cache512 KB192 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0n/a
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Form factorno dataMXM-B
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s115 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1211.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.0
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCLNot Listed1.2
Vulkan-N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2015 12 April 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 75 Watt

R9 M395X has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

FirePro M8900, on the other hand, has 233% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M395X and FirePro M8900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M395X is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M8900 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 20 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M395X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 10 votes

Rate FirePro M8900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M395X or FirePro M8900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.