GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 vs Radeon R9 M395

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking453not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameno dataCrush11
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 June 2015 (10 years ago)4 June 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792no data
Core clock speed834 MHz175 MHz
Number of transistors5000 Million20 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Texture fill rateno data0.7
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 127.0
OpenGL4.41.2
OpenCLNot ListedN/A
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 June 2015 4 June 2001
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

R9 M395 has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M395 and GeForce2 MX + nForce 420. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M395 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 25 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M395 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce2 MX nForce 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M395 or GeForce2 MX + nForce 420, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.