ATI FireMV 2250 vs Radeon R9 M385X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking668not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameStratoRV516
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,080 million105 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data32 Watt
Texture fill rate61.602.400
Floating-point processing power1.971 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs564

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz800 MBps
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x S-Video, 1x DMS-59
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 129.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.33.0
OpenGL4.42.1
OpenCLNot ListedN/A
Vulkan-N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm

R9 M385X has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M385X and FireMV 2250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M385X is a notebook graphics card while FireMV 2250 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M385X
Radeon R9 M385X
ATI FireMV 2250
FireMV 2250

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 6 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M385X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M385X or FireMV 2250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.