Radeon R9 M370X vs Iris Pro Graphics P580

Place in performance ranking	579	652
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Gen. 9 Skylake (2015−2016)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	Skylake GT4e	Cape Verde
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 September 2015 (8 years old)	19 May 2015 (8 years old)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	72	640
Core clock speed	350 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	189 million	1500 Million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	75.60	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Radeon R9 M370X compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	64 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	eDRAM + 64/128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	4500 MHz
Shared memory	+	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (FL 11_1)
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.1	no data
Vulkan	1.1.97	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Pro Graphics P580 5.22
+30.8%

R9 M370X 3.99

Iris Pro Graphics P580 outperforms Radeon R9 M370X by 31% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Iris Pro Graphics P580 2020
+30.8%

R9 M370X 1544

Iris Pro Graphics P580 outperforms Radeon R9 M370X by 31% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

40−45
+17.6%

−17.6%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10
+28.6%

7−8

−28.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Battlefield 5	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%
Hitman 3	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Battlefield 5	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%
Hitman 3	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −36.4%	15 +36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Battlefield 5	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +37.5%	8 −37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Hitman 3	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2	0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Hitman 3	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

This is how Iris Pro Graphics P580 and R9 M370X compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

Iris Pro Graphics P580 is 17.6% faster than R9 M370X

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Pro Graphics P580 is 300% faster than the R9 M370X.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M370X is 36.4% faster than the Iris Pro Graphics P580.

All in all, in popular games: