GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking436not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.79no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)G7x (2005−2006)
GPU code nameAmethystG71M
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 November 2014 (11 years ago)12 October 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204864
Core clock speed850 MHz16 MHz
Boost clock speedno data575 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million556 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate108.8no data
Floating-point processing power3.482 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs128no data
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2x512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1362 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth174.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)GDDR3
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 November 2014 12 October 2006
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 90 Watt

R9 M295X Mac Edition has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Go 7950 GTX SLI, on the other hand, has 177.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI
GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition or GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.