GeForce GTX 570M vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
E8950 R9 M295X R9 M295X Mac Edition R9 M390X R9 M395X R9 M395X Mac Edition R9 M485X
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
560M 560M SLI 570M 580M 580M SLI 765M 850M 860M 950M 960M 970M 980M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and GeForce GTX 570M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M295X Mac Edition
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
12.35
+178%

R9 M295X Mac Edition outperforms 570M by a whopping 178% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R9 M295X Mac Edition R9 M295X Mac Edition
GTX 570M GTX 570M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking441707
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.804.57
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameAmethystGF114
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 November 2014 (11 years ago)28 June 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048336
Core clock speed850 MHz575 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate108.832.20
Floating-point processing power3.482 TFLOPS0.7728 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs12856
L1 Cache512 KB448 KB
L2 Cache512 KB384 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1362 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth174.3 GB/s72.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
3D Gaming-+
Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 API
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p100−110
+170%
37
−170%
Full HD140−150
+164%
53
−164%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how R9 M295X Mac Edition and GTX 570M compete in popular games:

  • R9 M295X Mac Edition is 170% faster in 900p
  • R9 M295X Mac Edition is 164% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 56 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 12.35 4.45
Recency 23 November 2014 28 June 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 75 Watt

R9 M295X Mac Edition has a 178% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 167% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 570M, on the other hand, has 233% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 570M in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R9 M295X Mac Edition Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
R9 M295X Radeon R9 M295X
GTX 570M GeForce GTX 570M
vs
HD Graphics 5600 HD Graphics 5600
R9 M295X Mac Edition Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
R9 M270X AMD R9 M270X
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
R9 M270X AMD R9 M270X
vs
UHD Graphics 750 (Alder Lake) 750 (Alder Lake)
R9 M270X AMD R9 M270X
vs
RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q 3070 Ti Max-Q
R9 M270X AMD R9 M270X
vs
HD 7410M 7410M
R9 M270X AMD R9 M270X
vs
Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU 16-Core GPU
R9 M295X Mac Edition AMD R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
HD 8570M 8570M
R9 M295X Mac Edition AMD R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
HD Graphics 2500 2500
R9 M295X Mac Edition AMD R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 640
R9 M295X Mac Edition AMD R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
HD Graphics 630 630
R9 M295X Mac Edition AMD R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
Quadro M2200 M2200

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 29 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 570M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition or GeForce GTX 570M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.