GeForce 9100M G mGPU vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking441not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.80no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameAmethystC79
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 November 2014 (11 years ago)29 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20488
Core clock speed850 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate108.83.600
Floating-point processing power3.482 TFLOPS0.0176 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs1288
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1362 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth174.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.34.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 November 2014 29 July 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 12 Watt

R9 M295X Mac Edition has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 132% more advanced lithography process.

9100M G mGPU, on the other hand, has 1983% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition or GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.