ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs R9 M290X Crossfire

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking350not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.60no data
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNeptune CFRV630
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2014 (11 years ago)21 February 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560120
Core clock speed850 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors2x 2800 Million390 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data5.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.168 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2014 21 February 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 45 Watt

R9 M290X Crossfire has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 2600 XT Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 344.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire and Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 11 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire or Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.