Jetson TX1 vs Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking351not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.61no data
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameNeptune CFGM20B
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 March 2014 (12 years ago)4 January 2015 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560256
Core clock speed850 MHz998 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors2x 2800 Million2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rateno data15.97
Floating-point processing powerno data0.511 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x4

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data9.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.0
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1
CUDA-5.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2014 4 January 2015
Chip lithography 28 nm 20 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 6 Watt

Jetson TX1 has an age advantage of 10 months, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 3233% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire and Jetson TX1. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 11 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 5 votes

Rate Jetson TX1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire or Jetson TX1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.