GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 vs Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking351not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.61no data
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameNeptune CFCrush11
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2014 (12 years ago)4 June 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed850 MHz175 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors2x 2800 Million20 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data0.7
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2x 256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed4800 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)7.0
OpenGLno data1.2
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2014 4 June 2001
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

R9 M290X Crossfire has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire and GeForce2 MX + nForce 420. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is a notebook graphics card while GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 11 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce2 MX nForce 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire or GeForce2 MX + nForce 420, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.