ATI All-In-Wonder X800 GT vs Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking348not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.59no data
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameNeptune CFR430
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2014 (11 years ago)21 September 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed850 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors2x 2800 Million160 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data3.200
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz490 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data15.68 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)9.0b (9_2)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2014 21 September 2004
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm

R9 M290X Crossfire has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire and All-In-Wonder X800 GT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder X800 GT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
ATI All-In-Wonder X800 GT
All-In-Wonder X800 GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 11 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder X800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire or All-In-Wonder X800 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.