Tegra X1 vs Radeon R9 M280X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking946not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameSaturnGM20B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 February 2015 (11 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896256
Core clock speed1000 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate61.6016.00
Floating-point processing power1.971 TFLOPS0.512 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs5616
L1 Cache224 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportNot Listedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount0 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthNot ListedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (12_1)
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listedno data
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 20 nm

Tegra X1 has a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M280X and Tegra X1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M280X is a notebook graphics card while Tegra X1 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M280X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 174 votes

Rate Tegra X1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M280X or Tegra X1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.