GeForce2 MX PCI vs Radeon R9 M280X

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking944not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameSaturnNV11 A2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 February 2015 (11 years ago)28 June 2000 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz175 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Texture fill rate61.600.7
Floating-point processing power1.971 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs564
L1 Cache224 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportNot Listedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedSDR
Maximum RAM amount0 MB32 MB
Memory bus widthNot Listed32 Bit
Memory clock speedno data166 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s664.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 117.0
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.41.2
OpenCLNot ListedN/A
Vulkan-N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 February 2015 28 June 2000
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

R9 M280X has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M280X and GeForce2 MX PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M280X is a notebook graphics card while GeForce2 MX PCI is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M280X
Radeon R9 M280X
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX PCI
GeForce2 MX PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M280X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 11 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M280X or GeForce2 MX PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.