ATI Graphics Ultra + vs Radeon R9 M270X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking825not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)no data
GPU code nameVenusMach32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date21 March 2014 (12 years ago)1 January 1992 (34 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Compute units10no data
Core clock speed725 MHz10 MHz
Boost clock speed775 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm800 nm
Texture fill rate31.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.992 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs40no data
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DRAM
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s80.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 11None
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.4None
OpenCLNot ListedNone
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2014 1 January 1992
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 800 nm

R9 M270X has an age advantage of 22 years, a 409500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2757% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M270X and Graphics Ultra +. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M270X is a notebook graphics card while Graphics Ultra + is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 5 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M270X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M270X or Graphics Ultra +, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.