ATI Radeon 9600 PRO vs R9 M270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1518
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.43
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameno dataRV350
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2014 (12 years ago)1 October 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed725 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors1500 Million60 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data18 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.600
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4500 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data9.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)9.0 (9_0)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2014 1 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm

R9 M270 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M270 and Radeon 9600 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M270 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9600 PRO is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 6 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 87 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M270 or Radeon 9600 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.