GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon R9 M270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated303
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.96
Power efficiencyno data27.05
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTU116
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 April 2014 (12 years ago)23 April 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401536
Core clock speed725 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1335 MHz
Number of transistors1500 Million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data60 Watt
Texture fill rateno data128.2
Floating-point processing powerno data4.101 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data96
L1 Cacheno data1.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed4500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2014 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has an age advantage of 5 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M270 and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 6 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 616 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M270 or GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.