GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 vs Radeon R9 M270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameno dataNV34 B1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2014 (12 years ago)6 March 2003 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed725 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors1500 Million45 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Texture fill rateno data1.000
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed4500 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)9.0a
OpenGLno data1.5 (2.1)
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2014 6 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

R9 M270 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M270 and GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M270 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 6 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 6 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M270 or GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.