Apollo Lake GT1 5 vs Radeon R9 M265X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking839not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameVenusApollo Lake GT1 5
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date21 March 2014 (11 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640144
Compute units10no data
Core clock speed575 MHzno data
Boost clock speed625 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Texture fill rate25.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.8 TFLOPSno data
ROPs163
TMUs4018
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1125 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112.0 (12_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listedno data
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

Apollo Lake GT1 5 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M265X and Apollo Lake GT1 5. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M265X is a notebook graphics card while Apollo Lake GT1 5 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M265X
Radeon R9 M265X
Intel Apollo Lake GT1 5
Apollo Lake GT1 5

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 17 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M265X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Apollo Lake GT1 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M265X or Apollo Lake GT1 5, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.