ATI Radeon 9250 vs R9 Fury

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2751609
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.07no data
Power efficiency6.37no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameFijiRV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 July 2015 (10 years ago)1 March 2004 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584no data
Compute units56no data
Core clock speedno data240 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors8,900 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Wattno data
Texture fill rate224.00.96
Floating-point processing power7.168 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs2244
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors​2x 8-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)DDR
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width4096 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 128.1
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.51.4
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 Fury 9526
+476200%
Samples: 453
ATI 9250 2
Samples: 123

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90no data
1440p106no data
4K48no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.10no data
1440p5.18no data
4K11.44no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 50−55 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95 no data
Counter-Strike 2 130−140 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Fortnite 110−120 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Forza Horizon 5 70−75 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 no data
Valorant 160−170 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95 no data
Counter-Strike 2 130−140 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 268 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Dota 2 120−130 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Fortnite 95 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Forza Horizon 5 70−75 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90 no data
Metro Exodus 50−55 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 91 no data
Valorant 160−170 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Dota 2 130 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46 no data
Valorant 160−170 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 72 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 158 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 30−35 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 200−210 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 109 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 47 no data
Metro Exodus 20−22 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36 no data
Valorant 130−140 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 no data
Dota 2 102 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 25 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 July 2015 1 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

R9 Fury has an age advantage of 11 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 Fury and Radeon 9250. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 196 votes

Rate Radeon R9 Fury on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 56 votes

Rate Radeon 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 Fury or Radeon 9250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.