H200 SXM 141 GB vs Radeon R9 Fury

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking221not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.16no data
Power efficiency6.26no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Hopper (2022−2024)
GPU code nameFijiGH100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 July 2015 (9 years ago)18 November 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores358416896
Compute units56no data
Core clock speedno data1590 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1980 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 million80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt700 Watt
Texture fill rate224.01,045
Floating-point processing power7.168 TFLOPS66.91 TFLOPS
ROPs6424
TMUs224528
Tensor Coresno data528

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width2-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectors​2x 8-pin8-pin EPS
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)HBM3e
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB141 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s3.36 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 12N/A
Shader Model6.3N/A
OpenGL4.5N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-
CUDA-9.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 July 2015 18 November 2024
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 141 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 700 Watt

R9 Fury has 154.5% lower power consumption.

H200 SXM 141 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 3425% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 Fury and H200 SXM 141 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 Fury is a desktop card while H200 SXM 141 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Radeon R9 Fury
NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB
H200 SXM 141 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 174 votes

Rate Radeon R9 Fury on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate H200 SXM 141 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.