Radeon R9 290X2 vs R9 FURY X
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 192 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | 7.49 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 (2014−2017) | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) |
| GPU code name | Fiji | Hawaii |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | reference | no data |
| Release date | 24 June 2015 (8 years ago) | 24 June 2014 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $1,399 |
| Current price | $350 (0.5x MSRP) | $181 (0.1x MSRP) |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 | 2816 |
| Compute units | 64 | no data |
| Core clock speed | no data | 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 8,900 million | 6,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 275 Watt | 580 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 268.8 | 176.0 |
| Floating-point performance | 8,602 gflops | 2x 5,632 gflops |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 191 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | 3-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 4x 8-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | 1 | no data |
| Memory type | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | GDDR5 |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | + | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | 5400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 345.6 GB/s |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Eyefinity | 1 | no data |
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | no data |
| HDMI | + | + |
| DisplayPort support | + | no data |
Supported Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| AppAcceleration | + | no data |
| CrossFire | 1 | no data |
| Enduro | - | no data |
| FRTC | 1 | no data |
| FreeSync | 1 | no data |
| HD3D | + | no data |
| LiquidVR | 1 | no data |
| PowerTune | + | no data |
| TressFX | 1 | no data |
| TrueAudio | + | no data |
| ZeroCore | - | no data |
| UVD | + | no data |
| VCE | + | no data |
| DDMA audio | + | no data |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.2.131 |
| Mantle | + | no data |
Pros & Cons Summary
| Recency | 24 June 2015 | 24 June 2014 |
| Cost | $649 | $1399 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 275 Watt | 580 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 FURY X and Radeon R9 290X2. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
