Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs Radeon R9 FURY X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking285not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.81no data
Power efficiency6.28no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameFijiRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date24 June 2015 (10 years ago)4 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096768
Compute units64no data
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate268.872.00
Floating-point processing power8.602 TFLOPS2.304 TFLOPS
ROPs6424
TMUs25648
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache2 MB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length195 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)System Shared
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width4096 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1050 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth512 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 1.4a, 3x DisplayPort 1.2Portable Device Dependent
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+1.3
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 June 2015 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics 96EU has an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 1733.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 FURY X and Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 FURY X is a desktop graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics 96EU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 91 votes

Rate Radeon R9 FURY X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 297 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 FURY X or Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.