Matrox Millennium G400 vs Radeon R9 A375

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking885not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameVenusToucan
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2015 (11 years ago)20 May 1999 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1015 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,500 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm250 nm
Texture fill rate40.600.25
ROPs162
TMUs402

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Lengthno data150 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4.5 GB/s166 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)6.0
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)None
Vulkan1.2.170N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 250 nm

R9 A375 has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 793% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 A375 and Matrox Millennium G400. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R9 A375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Matrox Millennium G400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 A375 or Matrox Millennium G400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.