ATI Radeon 9200 LE vs R9 390X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2881602
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.62no data
Power efficiency6.19no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGrenadaRV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (10 years ago)1 May 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816no data
Core clock speedno data250 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,200 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate184.81.000
Floating-point processing power5.914 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1764
L1 Cache704 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin1x Molex
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount0 MB64 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 128.1
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 390X 9275
+463650%
Samples: 1347
ATI 9200 LE 2
Samples: 13

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD91no data
4K48no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.71no data
4K8.94no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 120−130 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95 no data
Counter-Strike 2 120−130 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 no data
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Fortnite 110−120 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Forza Horizon 5 70−75 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 no data
Valorant 160−170 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95 no data
Counter-Strike 2 120−130 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 no data
Dota 2 110−120 no data
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Fortnite 110−120 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Forza Horizon 5 70−75 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 45−50 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76 no data
Valorant 160−170 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 no data
Dota 2 110−120 no data
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41 no data
Valorant 160−170 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 30−33 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 190−200 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 50−55 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data
Metro Exodus 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29 no data
Valorant 130−140 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Dota 2 75−80 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 June 2015 1 May 2003
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 28 Watt

R9 390X has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 LE, on the other hand, has 882.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 390X and Radeon 9200 LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390X
Radeon R9 390X
ATI Radeon 9200 LE
Radeon 9200 LE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 287 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 390X or Radeon 9200 LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.