AMD Radeon R9 390X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 153$
Games supported 93%
AMD Radeon R9 390X
Radeon R9 390X
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 0
  • Max video memory 0
  • Memory type GDDR5
  • Memory clock speed 1050
  • Maximum resolution
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed 7.0 Gbps
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 350$
Games supported 93%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating146149
Value for money62.3021.22
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGrenada XTGK110
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date16 June 2015 (7 years ago)7 November 2013 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 $699
Price now$153 (0.4x MSRP)$350 (0.5x MSRP)
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816no data
CUDA coresno data2880
Boost clock speed1050 MHz928 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)275 Wattno data
Texture fill rate184.8210 billion/sec
Floating-point performance5,914 gflops5,345 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length275 mm10.5" (26.7 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pinno data
SLI optionsno data+
Bridgeless CrossFire1no data

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount0 MBno data
Memory bus width512 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz7.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s336 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data4 displays
Eyefinity+no data
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+no data
HDCPno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
DisplayPort support+no data
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D-no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore-no data
VCE+no data
DDMA audio+no data
Blu Ray 3Dno data+
3D Gamingno data+
3D Visionno data+
3D Vision Liveno data+

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan+1.1.126
Mantle+no data
CUDAno data+

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 390X 31.87
+1.5%
GTX 780 Ti 31.40
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Vantage Performance
  • Passmark

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R9 390X 74351
GTX 780 Ti 75688
+1.8%
R9 390X 10431
+4.6%
GTX 780 Ti 9974

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 390X 12389
+4.9%
GTX 780 Ti 11812

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R9 390X 17944
+14.9%
GTX 780 Ti 15619

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R9 390X 35807
GTX 780 Ti 38813
+8.4%

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 390X 9481
+1.5%
GTX 780 Ti 9341

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon R9 390X and GeForce GTX 780 Ti. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 684 Mh/s 322 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 27.5 Mh/s no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD91
−6.6%
97
+6.6%
4K47no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Hitman 3 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Hitman 3 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+145%
30−35
−145%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
+32.3%
30−35
−32.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Hitman 3 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Hitman 3 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
−6.9%
30−35
+6.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 31.87 31.40
Novelty 16 June 2015 7 November 2013
Cost $429 $699
Memory bus width 512 384
Memory bandwidth 384 336

Technical City couldn't decide between

AMD Radeon R9 390X
AMD Radeon R9 390X

and

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of Radeon R9 390X by NVIDIA

The nearest Radeon R9 390X's NVIDIA equivalent is GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB, which is faster by 1% and higher by 3 positions in our rating.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon R9 390X:

Competitors of GeForce GTX 780 Ti by AMD

The nearest GeForce GTX 780 Ti's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 6500 XT, which is faster by 1% and higher by 1 position in our rating.

AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT Radeon RX 6500 XT
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 780 Ti:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 100

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 144 ratings

Rate AMD Radeon R9 390X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 337 ratings

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.