GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile vs Radeon R9 390X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking288not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.50no data
Power efficiency6.18no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGrenadaG72
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (10 years ago)18 January 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816no data
Core clock speedno data450 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,200 million112 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate184.81.800
Floating-point processing power5.914 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642
TMUs1764
L1 Cache704 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount0 MB256 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz266 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s4.256 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 129.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.33.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 June 2015 18 January 2006
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 23 Watt

R9 390X has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

7300 GS Low Profile, on the other hand, has 1095.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 390X and GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390X
Radeon R9 390X
NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile
GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 285 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 390X or GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.