Arctic Sound 2T vs Radeon R9 390X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking288not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.56no data
Power efficiency6.20no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGrenadaArctic Sound
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (10 years ago)2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28167680 ×2
Core clock speedno data900 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,200 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate184.8216.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power5.914 TFLOPS13.82 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs64120 ×2
TMUs176240 ×2
L1 Cache704 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length275 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount0 MB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width512 Bit4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1050 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s1.23 TB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 500 Watt

R9 390X has 81.8% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound 2T, on the other hand, has a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 390X and Arctic Sound 2T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 390X is a desktop graphics card while Arctic Sound 2T is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390X
Radeon R9 390X
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
Arctic Sound 2T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 294 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound 2T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 390X or Arctic Sound 2T, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.