R9 390 X2 vs R7 265

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
not rated
 
not rated
Architecture
GCN 2.0
 
GCN 1.0
GPU code name
Grenada
 
Pitcairn
Market segment
Desktop
 
Desktop
Design
no data
 
reference
Launch date
3 September 2015 (5 years ago)
 
13 February 2014 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)
$1,399
 
$149
Price now
$225 (0.2x MSRP)
 
$358 (2.4x MSRP)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
2560
 
1024
Core clock speed
1000 MHz
 
no data
Boost clock speed
no data
 
925 MHz
Number of transistors
6,200 million
 
2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
28 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
580 Watt
 
150 Watt
Texture fill rate
160.0
 
59.20
Floating-point performance
2x 5,120 gflops
 
1,894 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support
no data
 
PCIe 3.0
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
 
PCIe 3.0 x16
Length
no data
 
210 mm
Supplementary power connectors
4x 8-pin
 
1 x 6-pin

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
GDDR5
 
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
 
4 GB
Memory bus width
512 Bit
 
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5400 MHz
 
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
345.6 GB/s
 
179.2 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
 
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity
-
 
+
HDMI
+
 
+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire
-
 
+
FreeSync
-
 
+
DDMA audio
no data
 
+

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX
12 (12_0)
 
DirectX® 12
Shader Model
6.3
 
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
 
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
 
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
 
-

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon R9 390 X2 and Radeon R7 265. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
57 Mh/s +293.1%
 
14.5 Mh/s −293.1%

Competitors of Radeon R9 390 X2 from NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon R9 390 X2 from NVIDIA is GeForce GTX TITAN Z.

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon R9 390 X2:

Competitors of Radeon R7 265 from NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon R7 265 from NVIDIA is GeForce GTX 1050.

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon R7 265:

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 390 X2

Much newer (3 September 2015 vs 13 February 2014)

Cheaper ($225 vs $358)

Wider memory bus (512 vs 256 bit)

More pipelines (2560 vs 1024)

Higher memory bandwidth (345.6 vs 179.2 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265

Lower power consumption (150W vs 580W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.

Mantle (an API developed by AMD for 3D graphics acceleration. Discontinued and later superceded by Vulkan)

So, which one is the better GPU?

Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 and AMD Radeon R7 265. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
AMD Radeon R7 265
Like
Like

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.