Radeon HD 8750A vs R9 390 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGrenadaMars
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date3 September 2015 (10 years ago)2 February 2013 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560 ×2384
Core clock speed1000 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)580 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate160.0 ×214.40
Floating-point processing power5.12 TFLOPS ×20.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×28
TMUs160 ×224
L1 Cache640 KB96 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors4x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB ×21 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth345.6 GB/s ×216 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2015 2 February 2013
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 580 Watt 45 Watt

R9 390 X2 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

HD 8750A, on the other hand, has 1188.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 390 X2 and Radeon HD 8750A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 390 X2 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 8750A is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Radeon R9 390 X2
AMD Radeon HD 8750A
Radeon HD 8750A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 39 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8750A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 390 X2 or Radeon HD 8750A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.