Quadro M2000 vs Radeon R9 390 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated497
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.59
Power efficiencyno data9.91
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGrenadaGM206
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date3 September 2015 (10 years ago)8 April 2016 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399 $437.75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560 ×2768
Core clock speed1000 MHz796 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1163 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)580 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate160.0 ×255.82
Floating-point processing power5.12 TFLOPS ×21.786 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×232
TMUs160 ×248
L1 Cache640 KB288 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data201 mm
Width3-slot1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors4x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount8 GB ×24 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz1653 MHz
Memory bandwidth345.6 GB/s ×2Up to 106 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12
Shader Model6.36.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2015 8 April 2016
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 580 Watt 75 Watt

R9 390 X2 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Quadro M2000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 673% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 390 X2 and Quadro M2000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 390 X2 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro M2000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 39 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 232 votes

Rate Quadro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 390 X2 or Quadro M2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.