GeForce 710M vs Radeon R9 390 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1140
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.43
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameGrenadaGK208
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date3 September 2015 (10 years ago)24 July 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560 ×2192
Core clock speed1000 MHz719 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)580 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate160.0 ×211.50
Floating-point processing power5.12 TFLOPS ×20.2761 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×28
TMUs160 ×216
L1 Cache640 KB32 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors4x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB ×21 GB
Standard memory configurationno dataDDR3
Memory bus width512 Bit ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth345.6 GB/s ×214.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportno dataUp to 2560x1600
LVDS signal supportno dataUp to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display supportno dataUp to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno dataUp to 2560x1600
HDMI++
HDCP content protection-+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI-+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support-+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder-+
Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 API
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2015 24 July 2013
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 580 Watt 15 Watt

R9 390 X2 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GeForce 710M, on the other hand, has 3766.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 390 X2 and GeForce 710M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 390 X2 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 710M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Radeon R9 390 X2
NVIDIA GeForce 710M
GeForce 710M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 39 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 791 votes

Rate GeForce 710M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 390 X2 or GeForce 710M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.