GeForce 610M vs Radeon R9 390 X2
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1231 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 4.49 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | Grenada | GF119 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 3 September 2015 (10 years ago) | 1 December 2011 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,399 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 ×2 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 738 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 900 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 6,200 million | 292 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 580 Watt | 12 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 160.0 ×2 | 5.904 |
| Floating-point processing power | 5.12 TFLOPS ×2 | 0.1417 TFLOPS |
| Video decoders | no data | H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 4 |
| TMUs | 160 ×2 | 8 |
| L1 Cache | 640 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | 128 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | no data | PCI Express 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Width | 3-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 4x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB ×2 | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit ×2 | 64bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1350 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 345.6 GB/s ×2 | Up to 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | no data | Up to 2048x1536 |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 September 2015 | 1 December 2011 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 580 Watt | 12 Watt |
R9 390 X2 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.
GeForce 610M, on the other hand, has 4733% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 390 X2 and GeForce 610M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R9 390 X2 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 610M is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
