ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650 vs Radeon R9 390 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGrenadaRV635
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 September 2015 (9 years ago)28 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399 $199

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560 ×2120
Core clock speed1000 MHz722 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million378 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)580 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate160.0 ×25.776
Floating-point processing power5.12 TFLOPS ×20.1733 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×24
TMUs160 ×28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data232 mm
Width3-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors4x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB ×2512 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz594 MHz
Memory bandwidth345.6 GB/s ×219.01 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.34.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2015 28 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 580 Watt 55 Watt

R9 390 X2 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650, on the other hand, has 954.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 390 X2 and All-In-Wonder HD 3650. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Radeon R9 390 X2
ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650
All-In-Wonder HD 3650

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 38 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder HD 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 390 X2 or All-In-Wonder HD 3650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.