Tesla S2050 vs Radeon R9 380X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking397not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.03no data
Power efficiency5.94no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameAntiguaGF100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date19 November 2015 (10 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $11,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048448 ×4
Compute units32no data
Core clock speedno data574 MHz
Boost clock speed970 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,000 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt900 Watt
Texture fill rate124.232.14 ×4
Floating-point processing power3.973 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs3248 ×4
TMUs12856 ×4
L1 Cache512 KB896 KB
L2 Cache512 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length221 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors​2 x 6-pinno data
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB3 GB ×4
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed970 MHz773 MHz
Memory bandwidth182.4 GB/s148.4 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2015 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 900 Watt

R9 380X has an age advantage of 4 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 373.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 380X and Tesla S2050. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 380X is a desktop graphics card while Tesla S2050 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 380X
Radeon R9 380X
NVIDIA Tesla S2050
Tesla S2050

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 219 votes

Rate Radeon R9 380X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 58 votes

Rate Tesla S2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 380X or Tesla S2050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.