CMP 170HX vs Radeon R9 380X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking397not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.03no data
Power efficiency5.94no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameAntiguaGA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date19 November 2015 (10 years ago)1 September 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $4,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20484480
Compute units32no data
Core clock speedno data1140 MHz
Boost clock speed970 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate124.2394.8
Floating-point processing power3.973 TFLOPS12.63 TFLOPS
ROPs32128
TMUs128280
Tensor Coresno data280
L1 Cache512 KB13.1 MB
L2 Cache512 KB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length221 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors​2 x 6-pin2x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed970 MHz1458 MHz
Memory bandwidth182.4 GB/s1,493 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 12N/A
Shader Model6.3N/A
OpenGL4.5N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2015 1 September 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 250 Watt

R9 380X has 32% lower power consumption.

CMP 170HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 380X and CMP 170HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 380X is a desktop graphics card while CMP 170HX is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 219 votes

Rate Radeon R9 380X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 21 votes

Rate CMP 170HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 380X or CMP 170HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.