Quadro4 200 NVS vs Radeon R9 380

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking396not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.67no data
Power efficiency5.79no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameAntiguaNV17 A3
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (10 years ago)22 December 2003 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792no data
Compute units28no data
Core clock speedno data250 MHz
Boost clock speed970 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,000 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt11 Watt
Texture fill rate108.61.000
Floating-point processing power3.476 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs1124
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length221 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorfull height / full length / dual slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2 x 6-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed970 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth182.4 GB/s8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x LFH60
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 128.0
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.51.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 June 2015 22 December 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 11 Watt

R9 380 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro4 200 NVS, on the other hand, has 1627.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 380 and Quadro4 200 NVS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 380 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro4 200 NVS is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 380
Radeon R9 380
NVIDIA Quadro4 200 NVS
Quadro4 200 NVS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 890 votes

Rate Radeon R9 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Quadro4 200 NVS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 380 or Quadro4 200 NVS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.