ATI All-In-Wonder 128 vs Radeon R9 380

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking394not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.34no data
Power efficiency5.79no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameAntiguaRage 4
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (10 years ago)16 June 1999 (26 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792no data
Compute units28no data
Core clock speedno data90 MHz
Boost clock speed970 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,000 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Wattno data
Texture fill rate108.60.36
Floating-point processing power3.476 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs1124
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length221 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorfull height / full length / dual slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2 x 6-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed970 MHz90 MHz
Memory bandwidth182.4 GB/s720.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x VGA, 2x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 126.0
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.51.2
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 June 2015 16 June 1999
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 250 nm

R9 380 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 792.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 380 and All-In-Wonder 128. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 380
Radeon R9 380
ATI All-In-Wonder 128
All-In-Wonder 128

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 883 votes

Rate Radeon R9 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 7 votes

Rate All-In-Wonder 128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 380 or All-In-Wonder 128, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.