Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking460not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.90no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameTrinidadGT200B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date5 May 2015 (11 years ago)11 November 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,799

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280192
Core clock speed925 MHz602 MHz
Boost clock speed975 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,800 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate78.0038.53
Floating-point processing power2.496 TFLOPS0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs8064
L1 Cache384 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB192 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length221 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2015 11 November 2008
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 150 Watt

R9 370 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 167% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 96% more advanced lithography process, and 36% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 370 and Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 370 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 495 votes

Rate Radeon R9 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 370 or Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.